|
|
|
|
Arsenic
Chromium VI Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquids (DNAPLs) 1,4-Dioxane Dioxins Mercury MTBE Perchlorate POPs PCBs TCE Other Contaminants
Detection and Site Characterization Until recently, the discovery of 1,4-dioxane at cleanup sites often occurred well after the completion of site characterization and remedial design, complicating implementation of effective remedial measures for the compound. The possible presence of 1,4-dioxane has not been investigated at the majority of solvent release sites due to the relatively recent development of the laboratory methods necessary to detect it at concentrations less than 100 µg/L, and to the recent and increasing awareness that it might be a contaminant of concern at solvent release sites. Commercial laboratories commonly analyze for 1,4-dioxane in water by three methods: EPA 524.2 for drinking water, and EPA 8260 and 8270 (though the latter method does not list 1,4-dioxane) for ground water and hazardous waste. A modification to EPA 8260 has allowed lower detection limits. Determination of 1,4-dioxane in water at low detection levels is accomplished most often using modified EPA 8270 with liquid-liquid extraction and isotope dilution by capillary column gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). This GC-MS method is optimized for 1,4-dioxane as a single analyte. The purpose of this section is to identify analytical and sampling methods commonly used for detecting, measuring, and/or monitoring 1,4-dioxane that are available on line. The intent is not to provide an exhaustive list of analytical methods, but to identify well-established, standard methods, particularly those used for environmental samples and approved by EPA. Adapted from:
Analysis of 1,4-Dioxane by Heated Purge & Trap GC/MS
ESTCP passive flux meter (PFM) demonstration and validation projects include MTBE flux measurement at Port Hueneme, perchlorate flux at the Naval Surface Warfare Center at Indianhead, and TCE flux at NASA Launch Complex 34 at Cape Canaveral. Mass Flux Toolkit to Evaluate Groundwater Impacts, Attenuation, and Remediation Alternatives To help site managers and site consultants estimate mass flux and understand the uncertainty in those estimates, ESTCP has funded the development of a computerized Mass Flux Toolkit, free software that gives site personnel the capability to compare different mass flux approaches, calculate mass flux from transect data, and apply mass flux to manage ground-water plumes. The toolkit spreadsheet and associated documentation are available on the ESTCP contractor's website in a zipped file.
Results Report for the Demonstration of No-Purge Groundwater Sampling Devices at Former McClellan Air Force Base, CA Analyses of VOCs, metals, anions, and 1,4-dioxane levels in samples from four diffusion and two grab-type no-purge samplers were compared to those from conventional low-flow and three-well-volume purge samples.
Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes: Physical/Chemical Methods, 3rd Edition
Literature References Measurement and Monitoring Technologies for the 21st Century Initiative (21M2) Literature Search |