State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Site Profiles
Johannsen Cleaners, Lebanon, Oregon
Description
|
Johannsen Cleaners began operations in 1955 and operated until 2002. It is currently a drop store (no on-site cleaning). In 1990, perchloroethylene (PCE) contamination was discovered in an irrigation well in the area. Additional sampling over the next few years found PCE contamination in a number of private and domestic wells. From 1993-1995 work at the site indicated soil and groundwater contaminated with PCE. The site is located in an business district with some limited urban residential nearby. One identified source area was near the sewer line, where shallow soils were identified (and later removed). |
Contaminants
Contaminants present and the highest amount
detected in both soil and groundwater.
Contaminant | Media | Concentration (ppb) | Nondetect |
---|---|---|---|
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene | groundwater | 41,000 ppb | |
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) | groundwater | 3,400,000 ppb | |
Trichloroethene (TCE) | groundwater | 42,000 ppb | |
Vinyl Chloride | groundwater | 2.7 ppb |
Site Hydrology
Deepest Significant Groundwater Contamination: | 120ft bgs | |
Plume Size: | ||
Average Depth to Groundwater: | 12.5ft |
Lithology and Subsurface Geology
Upper surficial aquifer |
Alluvium containing gravel and sand with varying amounts of silt and clay. Silty sand Depth: 0-20ft bgs 20ft thick Gradient: 0.001ft/ft |
Pathways and DNAPL Presence
Groundwater Sediments Soil DNAPL Present |
Remediation Scenario
Cleanup
Goals: |
Technologies
In Situ Air Sparging |
Date implemented: Final remediation design: Results to date: Next Steps: |
|
In Situ Soil Removal |
Date implemented: Results to date: Next Steps: |
|
In Situ Bioremediation |
Why the technology was selected: Date implemented: Final remediation design: Results to date: Next Steps: Cost to Design and Implement: |
|
In Situ Multi Phase Extraction |
Why the technology was selected: Date implemented: Final remediation design: Results to date: Next Steps: Cost to Design and Implement: |
|
Ex Situ Air Stripping |
Why the technology was selected: Date implemented: Final remediation design: Results to date: Next Steps: Cost to Design and Implement: |
|
Ex Situ Pump and Treat |
Why the technology was selected: Date implemented: Final remediation design: Results to date: Next Steps: Cost to Design and Implement: |
|
Ex Situ In Situ Flushing |
Why the technology was selected: Date implemented: Final remediation design: Results to date: Next Steps: Cost to Design and Implement: |
Costs
Cost
for Assessment: |
$126,000 | |
Cost
for Operation and Maintenance: |
$153,000 during P&T phase Currently $0 | |
Total
Costs for Cleanup: |
$480,000 |
Lessons Learned
1. Sewer discharge pipe ruptured. Need for upgrade/construction not realized. 2. Piping runs beneath flooring provided ideal access points to measure vacuum effect of treatment system. 3. 20/20 hindsight. Based on other sites, money may have been better spent on alternative cleanup/remediation (e.g HRC, bioremediation) sooner, rather than active treatment. 4. Re-use of pump and treat and SVE infrastructure was very helpful and cost saving for the bioremediation work. |
Contacts
Don Hanson Oregon DEQ 165 E. 7th Avenue, Suite 100 Eugene, OR 97401 hanson.don@deq.state.or.us |