State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Site Profiles
The Dry Cleaner, Altamonte Springs, Florida
Description
|
This an inactive PCE drycleaning facility that operated from 1990 to 1998. It is located in a strip mall adjacent to a residential neighborhood. Most of the residences obtain drinking water from private wells completed in the Floridan aquifer at depths as shallow as 95 feet bgs. The nearest municipal water supply well is located within a half mile of the site. The contaminant source area was located in the soil beneath the building floor slab in the vicinity of the drycleaning machine. |
Contaminants
Contaminants present and the highest amount
detected in both soil and groundwater.
Contaminant | Media | Concentration (ppb) | Nondetect |
---|---|---|---|
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) | groundwater | 7.2 ppb | |
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) | soil | 91,700 ppb | |
Trichloroethene (TCE) | groundwater | 1 ppb |
Site Hydrology
Deepest Significant Groundwater Contamination: | 80ft bgs | |
Plume Size: | Plume Length: 100ft Plume Width: 80ft |
|
Average Depth to Groundwater: | 48ft |
Lithology and Subsurface Geology
Slightly silty, fine to medium-grained quartz sands with lenses of clayey sand Depth: 0-38ft bgs 38ft thick Conductivity: 2.3ft/day Gradient: 0.002ft/ft |
||
Slightly sandy, phosphatic clay interbedded with white, fossilliferous, sandy limestone Depth: 38-61ft bgs 23ft thick Conductivity: 0.2ft/day |
||
Sandy clay and clayey sand Depth: 61-95ft bgs 34ft thick Conductivity: 7.9ft/day |
||
Fossiliferous limestone Depth: 95-130ft bgs 35ft thick |
Pathways and DNAPL Presence
Groundwater Sediments Soil DNAPL Present |
Vapor Intrusion Pathway
Has the potential for vapor intrusion (VI) been evaluated? |
No |
|
Has a vapor mitigation system been installed? |
Yes | |
Type of Vapor Mitigation System(s): |
Soil Vapor Extraction |
Remediation Scenario
Cleanup
Goals: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels (Groundwater - MCLs) PCE = 3.0 mg/L, TCE = 3.0 mg/L. Soils - leachability level - PCE = 30 mg/kg |
Technologies
In Situ Soil Vapor Extraction |
Why the technology was selected: Date implemented: Final remediation design: Results to date: Cost to Design and Implement: |
Costs
Cost
for Assessment: |
$105,875.03 | |
Cost
for Operation and Maintenance: |
$44,544.02 | |
Total
Costs for Cleanup: |
$228,198.27 |
Lessons Learned
1. SVE can remediate the vadose zone in a relatively short time period. 2. Project was successful due to comprehensive data collection during site assessment work and application of an appropriate remedial technology. |
Contacts
Aaron Cohen Florida Dept. of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Cleanup, MS 4500 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32399 850-245-8974 Aaron.Cohen@dep.state.fl.us Contractor: Kelly Bishop International Technology Corporation (813) 626-2336 kbishop@theitgroup.com |
Site Specific References
1. IT Contamination Assessment Report-7/97 2. IT Remedial Action Plan-11/98 3. IT Site Rehabilitation Completion Report-1/00 |