State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Site Profiles
Staten Island Cleaners, Florissant, Missouri
Description
|
The property has been developed as a retail shopping mall since 1968. The original dry cleaner building has been demolished and that area underlies part of current "Building K" and paved parking lot/drive adjacent to Building K. The owner agreed to install a vapor mitigation system in the subslab while Building K was under constuction since the site was under investigation. Remediation Status: Site closed |
Contaminants
Contaminants present and the highest amount
detected in both soil and groundwater.
Contaminant | Media | Concentration (ppb) | Nondetect |
---|---|---|---|
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene | groundwater | ||
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene | soil | ||
1,1-Dichloroethene | groundwater | ||
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) | groundwater | ||
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) | soil | ||
Trichloroethene (TCE) | groundwater | ||
Trichloroethene (TCE) | soil | ||
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene | groundwater | ||
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene | soil | ||
Vinyl Chloride | groundwater | ||
Vinyl Chloride | soil |
Site Hydrology
Deepest Significant Groundwater Contamination: | 7ft bgs | |
Plume Size: | ||
Average Depth to Groundwater: | 6.75ft |
Lithology and Subsurface Geology
silty clay to clay with few inclusions Depth: 0-30ft bgs 30ft thick Gradient: 0.025ft/ft |
Pathways and DNAPL Presence
Groundwater Sediments Soil DNAPL Present |
Vapor Intrusion Pathway
Has the potential for vapor intrusion (VI) been evaluated? |
Yes |
|
How was the site evaluated? |
Compared sample concentration to screening criteria |
|
Results of VI evaluation: |
A potential VI pathway has been indentified | |
Has a vapor mitigation system been installed? |
Yes | |
Type of Vapor Mitigation System(s): |
Passive Vapor Barrier Sub-slab Depressurization Sub-slab Pressurization Passive Venting HVAC controls/modifications Soil Vapor Extraction |
|
Additional VI Information: |
Indoor air and subslab effluent air were tested using Summa cannisters. First samples were taken during active depressurization. Later the system blower was shut off and the system now operates passively. Building K is a retail clothing store and military recuiting office which is believed to have affected the indoor air with a variety of chemicals. |
Remediation Scenario
Cleanup
Goals: |
Missouri Risk-Based Corrective Action Tier I, non-residential use, silty soil, Indoor air level = less than 0.009 mg/meter3 (air) |
|
Remedy Level: |
Full Scale Remedy |
Technologies
Ex Situ Vapor Mitigation |
Why the technology was selected: Date implemented: Final remediation design: Results to date: Next Steps: |
Costs
Cost
for Assessment: |
||
Cost
for Operation and Maintenance: |
||
Total
Costs for Cleanup: |
Environmental Consulting Services - $134,246.43 Lab Analysis - $20,772.72 Equipment Rental/Lease/Purchase - $10,336.17 Disposal/Treatment - $2,872 Groundwater Monitoring - $4,845 Operations & Maintenance - $23,378.75 Soil Boring/Monitoring Well Installation - $19,271.16 Remediation Activities - $52,044.44 Other Costs/Permits - $492.06 Site Restoration - $1,130 Grand Total - $269,388.75 |
Lessons Learned
The system has had problems with water pooling in the low point where the cleanout is. Depending on how much water collects, it could block airflow. |
Contacts
Vicky Kugler Missouri DNR Hazardous Waste Program P.O. Box 176 Jefferson City, MO 65102 573-522-2093 vicky.kugler@dnr.mo.gov |